I said in my book that the Rig Veda was rigged and the same language appears
here
answers.winscommunity.com/2010/12/13/hinduism-do-you-think-that-the-rig-veda-was-rigged

"Hinduism… Do you think that the Rig Veda was rigged?"
......
Is it merely a coincidence


One reader says-
".....I admire you for your great work."

Another reader says -
"..........it will benefit many people....."

one of the well wisher has uploaded my book on filestube
http://www.filestube.com/1gUBhsGekSfGNe8Fylaxbb/What-you-should-not-know-about-India.html


and here also
https://www.firstload.net/index.php?ir=1&fn=%22what+you+should+not+know+about...



Professor Stiglitz (Noble Prize winner on Tunisia )
"Everyone stresses the rule of law, but it matters a great deal what kind of rule of law is established. "
Deep thoughts !
Any comments from people who insist on great Indian culture, culture and heritage which should be adhered to?


------
Professor Stiglitz (Noble prize winner) about Tunisia
"how far beyond the rights enshrined in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights the country should go in writing its new constitution."

Is it possible to think going beyond Human Rights Declaration?
Is there any other way?
Yes
Its there
I have shown in my book
------------
Stealing???


http://in.reuters.com/article/2011/02/03/idINIndia-54646820110203

"Abdelrahman Hassan told his 9-year-old sister not to cry when he left his home in Alexandria to join the Cairo protests entering what may be their decisive phase.

"I hugged her a lot this morning. I told her I'm going to protect our future because they stole it before and they will do it again," the 28-year-old therapist said in the capital's Tahrir Square."


from page 401 of my book
"That only means that their rights have been stolen. And who can
steal the rights? Only the lawmakers could do it."

same basic idea in two different places!

Another coincidence -
http://af.reuters.com/article/topNews/idAFJOE71R0AJ20110228
"In Benghazi, Libya's second city, one cartoon on the wall of a state building portrays the Libyan leader as "Super Thief""
In My book on page 403-404
"These lawmakers, the Brahmans, are the people responsible
for resulting in stolen rights. They did it by creating the divine origin
of scriptures composed by them and making people to believe this

divine origin of scriptures. They embedded the laws in scriptures in
the form of functions. And knowing the statecraft did help. Thus,
they are the permanent and traditional thieves of the rights. Swindlers
and thieves - these are the right words to describe them
"

and also
http://af.reuters.com/article/topNews/idAFJOE71H0N320110218
""Ben Ali's regime stole everything. They had no heart and ignored us poor," said one of the men, who identified himself only as Khaled, 57. "
another coincidence ?
concept of stealing by lawmakers and rulers just goes on!!!

These sentences are not given in blog .
For these you will have to download the book
the available on scribd also
www.scribd.com/doc/47443117/What-You-Should-Not-Know-About-India

Friday, August 31, 2007

Varna Ashram -5

...The Vaisyas being mercantile caste owned all the capital in the economy though they had no say in the state and its coercive power. The Kshatriyas owned all the land. Apparently the highest group of Brahmanas was not supposed to own anything but it had devised various means to transfer the wealth from Kshatriyas and Vaisyas to them. They got the land grants from Kshatriyas and donations from Vaisyas through temples. They were the people who controlled the kings and society. Hence there was no need for them to have a direct desire or activity to own the resources. The king was not supposed to rule over these divine lawmakers. During Vedic sacrifices they got all the share of animals sacrificed. When sacrifices were stopped then they got a significant number of cows in donation that ultimately came from kings and Vaisyas. And when land became important they got the land grants from kings. When temples came into existence; they controlled them and the wealth that came in the form donations from Kshatriyas and Vaisyas. They also controlled the land given to temples in grant. Therefore, it cannot be said that they were the poor people of the society. They wielded the power in the society along with the king. One can say that the Hindu society was characterized by double power centers. The king could also not rule over them which mean that they were beyond any questioning. In other words, they were not responsible to anyone except scriptures which they had created and interpreted according to their likings. In addition they got all the administrative jobs with the kings. The state was a virtual fief for Kshatriyas and Brahmanas. The Brahmanas enjoyed the resources of state without doing any labor or running the risk of life like Kshatriyas. In later times the risk to a king’s life was also reduced to some extent by demilitarizing the general population. Only Kshatriyas and soldiers were allowed to hold the weapons. The much-acclaimed virtue of renunciation of Brahmanas is a grand deception that went quietly in the name of scripture. They sanctified all the transfers of wealth to them, in the scriptures. So such transfer of wealth was beyond question. This lasted for more than 2500 years. The current trend in this direction is weak but one never knows when it may become strong. Hindu religion has survived many bad times in the history....

No comments:

Post a Comment