I said in my book that the Rig Veda was rigged and the same language appears
here
answers.winscommunity.com/2010/12/13/hinduism-do-you-think-that-the-rig-veda-was-rigged

"Hinduism… Do you think that the Rig Veda was rigged?"
......
Is it merely a coincidence


One reader says-
".....I admire you for your great work."

Another reader says -
"..........it will benefit many people....."

one of the well wisher has uploaded my book on filestube
http://www.filestube.com/1gUBhsGekSfGNe8Fylaxbb/What-you-should-not-know-about-India.html


and here also
https://www.firstload.net/index.php?ir=1&fn=%22what+you+should+not+know+about...



Professor Stiglitz (Noble Prize winner on Tunisia )
"Everyone stresses the rule of law, but it matters a great deal what kind of rule of law is established. "
Deep thoughts !
Any comments from people who insist on great Indian culture, culture and heritage which should be adhered to?


------
Professor Stiglitz (Noble prize winner) about Tunisia
"how far beyond the rights enshrined in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights the country should go in writing its new constitution."

Is it possible to think going beyond Human Rights Declaration?
Is there any other way?
Yes
Its there
I have shown in my book
------------
Stealing???


http://in.reuters.com/article/2011/02/03/idINIndia-54646820110203

"Abdelrahman Hassan told his 9-year-old sister not to cry when he left his home in Alexandria to join the Cairo protests entering what may be their decisive phase.

"I hugged her a lot this morning. I told her I'm going to protect our future because they stole it before and they will do it again," the 28-year-old therapist said in the capital's Tahrir Square."


from page 401 of my book
"That only means that their rights have been stolen. And who can
steal the rights? Only the lawmakers could do it."

same basic idea in two different places!

Another coincidence -
http://af.reuters.com/article/topNews/idAFJOE71R0AJ20110228
"In Benghazi, Libya's second city, one cartoon on the wall of a state building portrays the Libyan leader as "Super Thief""
In My book on page 403-404
"These lawmakers, the Brahmans, are the people responsible
for resulting in stolen rights. They did it by creating the divine origin
of scriptures composed by them and making people to believe this

divine origin of scriptures. They embedded the laws in scriptures in
the form of functions. And knowing the statecraft did help. Thus,
they are the permanent and traditional thieves of the rights. Swindlers
and thieves - these are the right words to describe them
"

and also
http://af.reuters.com/article/topNews/idAFJOE71H0N320110218
""Ben Ali's regime stole everything. They had no heart and ignored us poor," said one of the men, who identified himself only as Khaled, 57. "
another coincidence ?
concept of stealing by lawmakers and rulers just goes on!!!

These sentences are not given in blog .
For these you will have to download the book
the available on scribd also
www.scribd.com/doc/47443117/What-You-Should-Not-Know-About-India

Wednesday, January 9, 2008

How the system worked ?- 9

....Therefore the cultural hegemony of Brahmanas, upholding of dharma by the kings, demilitarization, the mutilating system of justice, ostracization, Panchayats and the theory of previous life Karmas kept the Shudras and untouchables in their place and served to make the Varna dharma eternal. Any desire to rise up is killed by Karma theory and any actual action in such direction is punishable by Panchayats and kings.

Now we will see how the system worked as an economic unit. The Jajmani system is borrowed from the later Vedic period of Yajmans. The Yajmans were the Kshatriya patrons of the Brahmans. The Yajman or Jajman was the Kshatriya for whom the Brahman performed all the Yagyas and ritualistic ceremonies. The Jajman and the Brahman were tied personally to each other with generational ties. Once tied together the Jajman and the Brahman did not normally part company. The relationship continued for the generations altogether until some natural calamity occurred or when the patron or client became spatially separate due to some reasons.

This Jajmani system was also carried in the villages where the Jajman was the patron of village artisans also. The Jajmani system did the job of distribution of agriculture produce among the non-land owning classes. In other words they controlled the distribution of food and with it the lives of village people. There was no money transaction. The Jajman not only had the land but also an army of musclemen to help maintain the dharma in the society. These musclemen were the tillers on his land. They were ready to perpetrate violence on demilitarized village people. This provided the Shudras enough persuasions to fall in line. The muscle force, the social forces and the economic forces were really persuading which effectively prohibited the Shudra and untouchables from rebelling. This eliminated the use of frequent violence in the village. The subordination of low castes had become naturalized....

No comments:

Post a Comment