I said in my book that the Rig Veda was rigged and the same language appears
here
answers.winscommunity.com/2010/12/13/hinduism-do-you-think-that-the-rig-veda-was-rigged

"Hinduism… Do you think that the Rig Veda was rigged?"
......
Is it merely a coincidence


One reader says-
".....I admire you for your great work."

Another reader says -
"..........it will benefit many people....."

one of the well wisher has uploaded my book on filestube
http://www.filestube.com/1gUBhsGekSfGNe8Fylaxbb/What-you-should-not-know-about-India.html


and here also
https://www.firstload.net/index.php?ir=1&fn=%22what+you+should+not+know+about...



Professor Stiglitz (Noble Prize winner on Tunisia )
"Everyone stresses the rule of law, but it matters a great deal what kind of rule of law is established. "
Deep thoughts !
Any comments from people who insist on great Indian culture, culture and heritage which should be adhered to?


------
Professor Stiglitz (Noble prize winner) about Tunisia
"how far beyond the rights enshrined in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights the country should go in writing its new constitution."

Is it possible to think going beyond Human Rights Declaration?
Is there any other way?
Yes
Its there
I have shown in my book
------------
Stealing???


http://in.reuters.com/article/2011/02/03/idINIndia-54646820110203

"Abdelrahman Hassan told his 9-year-old sister not to cry when he left his home in Alexandria to join the Cairo protests entering what may be their decisive phase.

"I hugged her a lot this morning. I told her I'm going to protect our future because they stole it before and they will do it again," the 28-year-old therapist said in the capital's Tahrir Square."


from page 401 of my book
"That only means that their rights have been stolen. And who can
steal the rights? Only the lawmakers could do it."

same basic idea in two different places!

Another coincidence -
http://af.reuters.com/article/topNews/idAFJOE71R0AJ20110228
"In Benghazi, Libya's second city, one cartoon on the wall of a state building portrays the Libyan leader as "Super Thief""
In My book on page 403-404
"These lawmakers, the Brahmans, are the people responsible
for resulting in stolen rights. They did it by creating the divine origin
of scriptures composed by them and making people to believe this

divine origin of scriptures. They embedded the laws in scriptures in
the form of functions. And knowing the statecraft did help. Thus,
they are the permanent and traditional thieves of the rights. Swindlers
and thieves - these are the right words to describe them
"

and also
http://af.reuters.com/article/topNews/idAFJOE71H0N320110218
""Ben Ali's regime stole everything. They had no heart and ignored us poor," said one of the men, who identified himself only as Khaled, 57. "
another coincidence ?
concept of stealing by lawmakers and rulers just goes on!!!

These sentences are not given in blog .
For these you will have to download the book
the available on scribd also
www.scribd.com/doc/47443117/What-You-Should-Not-Know-About-India

Tuesday, January 15, 2008

Temples - 2

...The decline of Vedic gods was related to the decline of popularity of animal sacrifice due to intense competition from Buddhism. Any invocation of Vedic gods involved fire worship essentially meaning animal sacrifices. This made the Yagyas very costly. The Yagyas became limited to only kings and Kshatriyas who were landlords and could afford costly sacrifices. The Yagyas were still important to kings. The Vaisyas could not do it because if they sacrificed their animals then their survival would be at stake. By the time the Vaisyas gave up agriculture and cattle rearing the Brahmanas had also given up animal sacrifices and shifted mainly to temples. Thus to attract the general population and mainly the Vaisyas the Brahmanas gave up their Vedic gods and took up new gods to please. It was not necessary to offer animal sacrifices to please these new gods. The rituals in temples did not generally involve animal sacrifices.

With the growing importance of agriculture and kingdoms in Vedic society, there was also a need for the gods who could look after the whole of the affairs of these ever enlarging areas. The gods were needed who could handle growing importance of state territories, agriculture and all prevailing nature of rulership. More powerful gods were needed to look after this new universe and also those who could do without animal sacrifices. One alternative was to increase the powers of Vedic gods but it meant rewriting Vedas, which was not permitted. Thus the gods needing animal sacrifices fell out of general use. The general people needed other kinds of gods for their religious needs in this world and here after, with little cost attached to them. The donations in tmples were voluntary which did not impose involuntary cost on people like animal sacrifices. Thus costly Vedic gods needing costly animal sacrifices like Indra, Agni became minor or small deities or fell out of use. However, these costly gods who ensured victories in wars continued to be popular with the kings. The new gods were happy with worship and devotion of a devotee and, of course, a lot of donations. The temples also had the advantage of getting donations round the clock whereas the Yagyas had to be actually performed on a given occasion to get the donations and fees. The donations pertaining to Yagyas were related to certain specific activities. There was an enlargement of scope of taking donation and as well as that of powers of gods. The Stupas and temples were actually a regularization of worship that did not need any special occasion; they were open all the time with their daily rituals...

No comments:

Post a Comment